I read the news while flying to Las Vegas. Even though I was in a public place, I hung my head down and hoped my friend didn’t notice the tears.
I am not anti-war, but I cannot take people being sent to their deaths for no good reason.
I have lived an unbelievably blessed life. I cannot count the blessings for they are to many. I have a poor memory, but I still have tons of stories. Stories that nobody except the participants really would enjoy.
I think about all these mostly young men and all the stories that will never happen. There better be a damned good reason because the vast majority of these young men’s stories are just as important as mine or anyone’s. Yes, there are some turds that the world won’t miss. I don’t subscribe to every life is precious.
One of my life’s blessing is that I was able to travel around the world. Spending a good deal of time in Asia and Europe. The vast majority of people are just like me. They want to contribute to society and have a wonderful life. I wonder how it is that we would ever want to go to war against each other?
I don’t necessarily think it is a different path. My post wasn’t really about dogs or how humans treat animals. It is about how we select our “leaders”.
I recently read a x tweet from George Papadopoulos with regard to his thought on Tulsi Gabbard as VP. His thought was “untested”. In what manner is George talking about? Is he talking about character? All these superficial talking points? Gravitas, untested, 3 am phone call, eloquent speaker or the potato’s recent I can make government work.
What about character? Has any one of these folks passed a character test? Will any of them ever take a personal sacrifice for doing the right thing? They aren’t untested, they have been tested and failed.
The character test is the only test that really matters to me. I want the 3 am phone call answered by someone with character. Sending young people to their death is the most important reason that we must demand character from our leaders.
If you hear some CEO or Senator say they made the tough decision and they are still in their job, they are probably a turd. It isn’t tough if it doesn’t cost you. That is the heart of virtue signaling.
Sending people to their deaths is the ultimate reason we need leaders with character.
Therefore, war isn’t really off topic.
The putting down of an animal is potentially a character test. Either Kristi did it as an emotional reaction such as anger or she did it for the right reason. In the prior she failed a character test and in the latter she passed a character test.
If it was the former and she admitted it was a mistake that would be a positive character attribution. Today nobody can admit a mistake. If it was the latter, given every pet owner should know how damned difficult it is to euthanize a pet, the reaction should be damn she was willing to take an emotional loss to do the right thing.
I wonder how it is that we would ever want to go to war against each other? The world is full of leaders that lack character. The leaders of the “free world” are certainly no exception.