Against -isms

It’s that time again, about twice in a decade, when the votes are being cast. I don’t care much for Trump. He’s a narcissist, and he tries to please too much. He panders to the inane. And yet, he deserves your vote. He showed up, and he showed up against the odds.

As much as his opponents are trying to portray themselves as warriors for Democracy, they aren’t. They’re warriors for mind control, for fragmentation into splintering racist, sexist, and theocratic factions. They’ve overseen the creation of the Internet surveillance system, the decay of institutions, the ineptitude in global affairs, the replacement of competence with grievance.

Obama chanted ‘Yes We Can’. No you can’t. Move over, and let us have a functioning country again.

6 Likes

Years ago, I decided that elections are little more than (maybe?) some choice between the lesser of two evils. At the time I made this decision, I now realize just how naive I was! That is because then, I couldn’t begin to imagine the depth and breadth of the evil which is the democrat (sic) party. Can there be any doubt that its main contribution has been the intentional dismemberment of the polity - its fracture along every possible fault line for political gain?

The age-old “divide and conquer” tools are instead, now relentlessly hammered in (which one of their wizards recently used this image? Aha! - John Kerry RE: the “dangerous” Elon Musk) like steel wedges formerly used to split off granite. Once, the resultant materials were used - by the likes of Michelangelo and others - to create things of beauty out of unwieldy granite. Now, however, such false divisions of the polity serve to create tractable cadres of “oppressed” individuals, who “vote” as they are told (or are bought or merely “helped”; sometimes resuscitated, as when the departed continue to vote, in perpetuity, progressive) for the leftist saint du jour.

Trump, flawed and fallen as he is, at least has and can occasionally express a vision for the nation. Kamala Harris is unable to articulate any coherent vision of this country. In this complex technocracy, one might plausibly ask whether or not who the President is makes any difference. Surely, the choices as to any policy are complex and arcane.

Here is where the person who is President makes a critical difference: (s)he appoints those who formulate the universe of policy choices available; this is important. Then (s)he chooses among them (and/or amends them) according to his/her vision - worldview and understanding of the citizens (s)he represents. With Trump, we have a pretty good idea of who he is in that regard. Harris, by contrast, has hidden herself quite effectively (to the extent such a thought process actually exists). Look into her eyes and all you see is a smoke-filled (likely THC) room filled with shadowy Marxists/Maoists. There is little doubt where that would lead, if she manages to “win”.

Unfortunately, while so effectively dividing us, the dem party has also stymied every attempt to make our elections credible. Why else besides cheating, would they fight voter ID or removing ineligible (like dead or moved) voters from the rolls? Why stymie every attempt to prevent cheating - like extending voting over weeks/months and “vote harvesting”? I guess, like Justice Ketanji Jackson’s inability to define the word ‘woman’ because she’s not an ‘expert’, we need ‘experts’ and ‘fact checkers’ to tell us the blindingly obvious: democrats are intent on cheating. Considering they’ve been telling us “by any means necessary” since the '60’s, perhaps we ought to take them at their word.

6 Likes

They aren’t going to let us win, are they?

4 Likes

Eric S. Raymond:

I hear Kamala Harris has conceded. For just a moment, I’m going to abandon the high-decoupling rationalist stance I normally post from and talk about what I personally wanted from this election and now hope I might get.

For me, a good outcome in this election meant not Trump winning, but his enemies losing.

I’m not MAGA, and not a tribal conservative of either the old-school or new-school kind. I’m a libertarian, and have some serious differences with substance with Trump and his partisans.

Also I have never much liked Trump as a person. He’s vulgar and under-controlled; he talks and postures too much and, I think the charge that he’s a narcissist has some weight. But…he chooses his enemies well.

I will also admit that I think better of Trump now than I did three months ago. He has demonstrated literal courage under fire, which is an important quality in a man who may need to make life or death decisions about the fate of a nation. I went to see him speak, and I saw a man much calmer and more together than I was expecting.

But I’m not really posting about Trump today, and the only other thing I’m going to say about him is that his most valuable quality is that he enrages evil people into unmasking themselves.

I have believed for decades that the central problem of American politics is defeating the Gramscian long march through our institutions. Covert and not-so-covert Marxists have waged a remarkably successful memetic war. it has many manifestations - blatant bias in the mainstream media, welfare statism, DEI, climate alarmism, transgender ideology, open borders - but the goal is always the same. To cripple and destroy the Main Enemy, the United States of America and everyone in it who loves liberty.

Trump’s victory is the worst defeat of the Gramscians in my lifetime. They went all-in with an unprecedented campaign of lies, vitriol, hate propaganda, lawfare, and election rigging. He beat them anyway, and for that he has my respect.

What I want from the immediate aftermath of the election is to rejoice in their agonized screaming. What I want from Trump and Republican control of both houses is follow-through:

  1. Impose election security measures so we can’t be frauded again.

  2. Abolition of every federal firearms law and regulation, including the disbandment of the ATF. We must restore the proper Constitutional order in which the government is frightened of the people, not the reverse.

  3. Massive cuts in the reach and power of the administrative state. No unelected bureaucrat should ever have the power to effectively make law.

  4. A concerted and conscious attempt to drive the Communists and Communist tools out from everywhere that they have burrowed into our institutions, perhaps starting with the complete defunding of any educational institution that harbors academic Marxists.

Yes, I know, many of these people don’t know they’re Communist tools. I’m past caring. I’ve been ready to throw them out of helicopters with my own hands since about 2014, hoping against hope that something would happen to make that kind of violence unnecessary.

Now, maybe, we have a path to defeating them peacefully. I’m not sure Trump fully understands this necessity himself, but there are people close to him - notably Elon Musk and Ron Paul - who I’m pretty sure do.

The first thing we need to do is be able to name the enemy. Conservatives have been cowards about this ever since the Army-McCarthy hearings a few years before I was born. They became afraid to speak about or explicitly oppose Communist infiltration, and we have been paying an increasing price for that cowardice through my entire lifetime.

Conservatives? MAGA people? If you really want to make America great again, make defeat of the Gramscians your cause. Name the enemy. Expose them. Defeat them. They have crippled, divided, and corrupted us for far too long. It’s time to take our country back.

Some background:

Gramscians are people who are influenced by the ideas of Antonio Gramsci, a Marxist theorist, philosopher, and linguist. Gramsci’s theories are often applied to the study of international relations and the global political economy. His ideas are also influential in Western academia and society, and have been described as “entrenched dogma”.

Some of Gramsci’s ideas include:

  • Cultural hegemony The state and ruling class use cultural institutions to maintain power and wealth. Gramsci believed that the bourgeoisie uses ideology to develop a hegemonic culture, rather than violence, economic force, or coercion.

  • Civil society A public sphere where political parties and trade unions gain concessions from the state, and where ideas and beliefs are shaped.

  • Internationalism The capitalist world system must be overthrown internationally. However, Gramsci also believed that the workers’ movement must “nationalize” itself to be effective.

  • Common sense The ruling classes manipulate common sense to achieve domination. Gramsci argued that common sense prevents people from perceiving institutional exploitation.

Gramsci’s ideas have inspired strategies to contest hegemonic norms of legitimacy, including: Popular education practices, Liberation theology, and Participatory action research.

5 Likes

We have an opportunity now. It’s hard to believe (see my last comment here!). I really thought the Left were invincible; I had to kinda believe the old saw about how if voting could change anything, they wouldn’t let us do it. I thought 2016 was a one-off, frankly; the Left didn’t really believe then that Trump could win; they wouldn’t let it happen again. I was brainwashed! and I thought I was just worldly and cynical, a realist!
Our champion has prevailed! And this time I hope he’ll know whom he can rely on ,and whom he can’t trust. God save our Don!

4 Likes

2020 was a fluke or one off because of covid and fraudulent mail ballots. And Trump still won unofficially in 2020! I can’t prove it because all the evidence has been suppressed or destroyed.

I was feeling bullish on Monday night. I told myself don’t get optimistic like 2022 or 2020. I told a few friends Trump will win decisively and will win the popular vote. Another friend also thought Trump would win. He voted R for the first time. He also won 3000 bucks betting on Trump in every swing state except Pennsylvania. He didn’t bet on Pennsylvania because of Philadelphia fraud.

There was less fraud this year because Gretchen Whitmer and Josh Shapiro have presidential aspirations in 28. Secretly they hoped Kamala would lose.

Kamala is the worst candidate in our lifetime. She performed worse than Hillary.

Once in a while my worldview makes sense and accords with reality!

4 Likes

Sadly, the people that he – and we – can’t trust are the Institutional Republicrats in Congress. Evidence for this is that President Trump’s well-deserved victory has had very little coat-tails in the House, where the Institutionals may end up with little or no gain. Many citizens voted for President Trump but did not go on to vote for whoever else the Republicrat Party put forward.

President Trump’s victory was a personal achievement for him, and owes nothing to the Republicrats. If there was a lick of sense in those Institutionals, they would read the writing on the wall and begin to reform themselves.

3 Likes

So then, what is your opinion based on, if not the ‘destroyed or suppressed evidence’?

1 Like