This is an edited version of a post I made on 𝕏 on 2023-10-31 about Biden’s executive order on artificial intelligence. This version embeds llinks and quoted passages which have to to be done on 𝕏 by naked links and screen shots and expands upon the brief post at the end.
Here is full text of the Biden executive order on Artificial Intelligence, “Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence”.
It is horrific: intrusive reporting and regulation based on computational complexity and capacity, with arbitrary limits changeable at any time. These can be revised downward as hardware requirements fall to essentially require licensing and regulation of all computers. And all of this was imposed by dictatorial fiat by a computing caudillo without debate or legislation.
… the set of technical conditions for models and computing clusters that would be subject to the reporting requirements of subsection 4.2(a) of this section. Until such technical conditions are defined, the Secretary shall require compliance with these reporting requirements for:
(i) any model that was trained using a quantity of computing power greater than 10^{26} integer or floating-point operations, or using primarily biological sequence data and using a quantity of computing power greater than 10^{23} integer or floating-point operations; and
(ii) any computing cluster that has a set of machines physically co-located in a single datacenter, transitively connected by data center networking of over 100 Gbit/s, and having a theoretical maximum computing capacity of 10^{20} integer or floating-point operations per second for training AI.
Code is speech, and the U.S. has declared itself its enemy.
You can see where this is going. Right now, it’s defined so it only applies to the very largest players in the AI field, the very ones who have been begging to be regulated in the interests of regulatory capture and shutting out competition by faster-moving entrepreneurial actors. Thus, it’s like the U.S. income tax, which originally applied only to the “rich”, with only 1% of the population owing any tax, and very few of them paying more than 1% of net income. Or, like the Alternative Minimum Tax, enacted to target a total of 155 households in the U.S., but eventually ended up sucking millions into its maw, giving them the “benefit” of doing their taxes twice every year, and paying whichever was higher.
So it will be with computing. Once the camel’s nose (or is the Kamala’s Harris?) is under the tent, they’ll discover, to their horror, that progress in training and inference using reduced precision parameters and advances in acceleration instructions built into forthcoming generations of mass market processors will make it possible to train and perform inference with large neural network models on hardware no more expensive or exotic than a high-end gaming or video production rig today. And when that happens, do you think they’ll give up, admit defeat, and relinquish this power they’ve illegitimately seized? Of course not—this new “risk”, like the ability to manufacture firearms with home workshop 3D printers, will necessitate extending these “common sense regulations in the interest of public safety” to all “potentially hazardous” computing equipment and the software that runs on it.
This makes The Digital Imprimatur seem like weak tea. The endpoint here is registration and licensing of all computing equipment and, as the victims of government democide have discovered, registration leads to confiscation leads to extinction—always and everywhere.
Also of note in this 19,682 word dictatorial ukase, proclaimed without any participation by the U.S. citizens’ elected legislative representatives, are the restrictions on sharing information and commerce with “foreign” parties: the work “foreign” appears 36 times in the text. For example:
(B) records that foreign resellers of United States IaaS Products must securely maintain regarding a foreign person that obtains an account, including information establishing:
(1) the identity of such foreign person, including name and address;
(2) the means and source of payment (including any associated financial institution and other identifiers such as credit card number, account number, customer identifier, transaction identifiers, or virtual currency wallet or wallet address identifier);
(3) the electronic mail address and telephonic contact information used to verify a foreign person’s identity; and
(4) the Internet Protocol addresses used for access or administration and the date and time of each such access or administrative action related to ongoing verification of such foreign person’s ownership of such an account; and …
(“IaaS” means “Infrastructure as a Service”, as in cloud service providers, who should, if they have any sense, be packing up to depart the U.S. just as quickly as they can.)
This is not just setting sail toward, but pushing the throttle on the cigarette boat to eleven, on bringing back the insanity of the crypto wars of the 1990s when a U.S. citizen discussing code written outside the U.S. to implement an encryption algorithm with a non-U.S. citizen was considered a criminal act of “exporting munitions”. Back then, it was felonious factoring of large numbers, now it’s going to be malicious multiplication of matrices.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
— Friedrich Schiller, Die Jungfrau von Orleans, 1801