How to stop all these Injunctions

General Discussion
, ,
21

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71559589/chicago-headline-club-v-noem/

2 Likes
22

She became a naturalized citizen of the United States when she was 15

I was also naturalized at about age 15. Evidently, my experience of assimilation (or not) was somewhat different from hers. What a difference a few decades makes.

2 Likes
23

She is now Commander in Chief in Illinois:

TRO:

Appeal:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71608106/state-of-illinois-v-donald-j-trump/

1 Like
24

9th Circuit stays first TRO but not second because second had not been appealed.

This means that federalized Guard units stay federalized but can’t be deployed.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71554902/state-of-oregon-et-al-v-trump-et-al/

This is contrary to amicus argument that the second order is null because it was signed after the appeal.

Seems too cute by half.

The first TRO provided:

  1. Defendants are temporarily enjoined from implementing Defendants’ September 28, 2025, Memorandum ordering the federalization and deployment of Oregon National Guard service members to Portland.

The second TRO was overbroad as to the requested relief. The second order read:

  1. Defendants are temporarily enjoined from deploying federalized members of the National Guard in Oregon.

But the request was:

The State of Oregon and the City of Portland, now joined by the State of California, move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and stay of the active deployment of federalized members of the National Guard of California in the State of Oregon. In the alternative, the State and the City move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d) to modify this Court’s October 4, 2025, TRO to prohibit the relocation or deployment of any National Guard under Defendants’ command (i.e., Title 10 status) within the State of Oregon.

The second order was not limited to CA NG. The substance of the second order was thus the requested modification of the first order but not phrased as a modification perhaps to avoid the bar cited by amicus AFL.

3 Likes
25

Maybe it’s time to let these guys go. Sorry, Oregon and California bros. Your states may be beyond redemption, like Sodom and Gomorrah.

Portland leftists are blocking roads while holding a “NUDE DIE-IN” to “protest ICE”

4 Likes
26

Trump Supreme Court stay application re. Chicago:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25a443.html

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25A443/379964/20251017155210488_Trump%20v.%20Illinois%20No.%2025A__%20-%20Stay%20Application%20-%20Final.pdf

1 Like
27

9th circuit stays Portland TRO.

…After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when “the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.” The evidence the President relied on reflects a “colorable assessment of the facts and law within a ‘range of honest judgment.’” Newsom v. Trump, 141 F.4th 1032, 1051 (9th Cir. 2025) (per curiam) (quoting Sterling v. Constantin, 287 U.S. 378, 399 (1932)). We thus conclude that Defendants are likely to succeed on the merits of their appeal, and that the other stay factors weigh in their favor. We grant Defendants’ motion for a stay pending appeal.

Drew a lucky panel of two Trump appointees and one Clinton (dissenting). Plaintiffs have asked for en banc rehearing.

3 Likes
28

Rehearing denied:

1 Like
29

Going back to the title of this thread, the answer to how appears to be slow and steady.

2 Likes
30

Ninth circuit stays the stay:

1 Like
31

The beat goes on.

1 Like
32

Can Trump declare judicial clerks and staff to be non essential and place them on furlough?

Make federal judges write their own opinions without assistance from their clerks.

2 Likes
33

Their clerks are probably using AI, but still might stump the judge if they have to learn how to use AI.

2 Likes
34

Barrett punts for likely a month or more:

2 Likes
35

Judge Talwani, again:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71783393/commonwealth-of-massachusetts-v-united-states-department-of-agriculture/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

McConnell of the D RI:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71820142/rhode-island-state-council-of-churches-v-rollins/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

1 Like
36

A non-Talwani D MA judge gets stayed on trans passports.

The application for stay presented to JUSTICE JACKSON and by her referred to the Court is granted. The June 17, 2025 order of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, case No. 1:25–cv–10313, is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.

3 Likes
37

The Kentanji dissent reads like it was written by a space alien. pic.twitter.com/I8eNIC2rVN

— Pierre Chang (@PiereChangstein) November 6, 2025
2 Likes
38
39

Karin grants permanent injunction:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ord.189270/gov.uscourts.ord.189270.147.0_2.pdf

The findings of fact, including PPB testimony denying the existence of Antifa like Mario Cuomo denying the existence of the Mafia is notable. Even worse is the absurd deference given to the moving party.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ord.189270/gov.uscourts.ord.189270.146.0_2.pdf

2 Likes