None were regular WD TX judges:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Brown\_(judge) SD TX Trump 45 and a Rick Perry appointee to TX Supreme Court
Jerry Edwin Smith - Wikipedia 5th circuit Reagan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_C.\_Guaderrama Senior status WD TX Obama
This is infuriating⌠Hispanic is not a race, lacking literacy does not make you a member of a âprotectedâ class, another dubious category
Stay by Alito.
I would have been shocked if Alito did not stay the district court decision
Wait, does this mean Iâm not the Hispanic face of white supremacy?
This is the 7th Circuit stay in the Illinois case filed by alleged media:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72132615/state-of-minnesota-v-noem/
Too funny (and yes I know the real meaning):
- DHS consistently has a presence of vehicles and agents in the parking lot of a Karen-owned market in Saint Paul. Saint Paul has a large Karen population, and that population has reported that having DHS vehicles parked in that specific parking lot interferes with their ability to feel safe to purchase their culturally specific food which in turn harms the revenue of those local businesses.
Illinois sues, claiming itâs illegal to use the border patrol in the interior and numerous tactics:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72131845/state-of-illinois-v-department-of-homeland-security/
The district court entered a preliminary injunction with respect to federal
immigration-enforcement operations in Minnesota. The injunction is unlikely to
survive the governmentâs interlocutory appeal, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), so we
stay it pending a final decision in this case.
This is another Minnesota case where MN is the plaintiff. Federal judge denies PI against ICE. Order shows utter lack of judicial temperament in pro-plaintiff bias. But she realizes ruling for the plaintiffs will get her slapped down badly in view of the 8th Circuit case noted immediately above.
In a sane world this would be enough for mandatory recusal for bias.
More lack of judicial temperament from a Clinton appointee:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72185757/conejo-arias-v-noem/
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/24-7536/24-7536-2026-02-20.html
Now to be clear, the Ninth Circuit is not the Circuit of Wackadoo. We donât reflexively grant preliminary relief in all cases. That would be crazy. We only do so in immigration cases.
It may not be the Circuit of Wackadoo but it has been a circus for decades. Itâs nice to see someone explain how the Ninth Circus works in practice. The inconsistent treatment of en banc vacatur across circuits is yet another small sign among many of dysfunction in the judicial system.