If Trump dies from his wound…..

I reproduce the report’s points here:

● Following the attempted assassination, social media platforms have been inundated with false theories, many of which have gone viral.

● Cyabra conducted an analysis of phrases and hashtags associated with the predominant theory that the shooting was orchestrated by President Donald Trump. The investigation identified 3,115 profiles involved in this specific false narrative, 45% of whom were identified as fake accounts.

● The theory posited that Trump himself orchestrated the shooting to garner more voter support before the elections, labeling him a liar. It included the image of Trump with raised hands, suggesting that he had staged the event to boost his popularity in the media.

● The accounts engaged in the discourse surrounding the theory utilized hashtags such as #fakeassassination and #stagedshooting. These posts received over 404,000 engagements, potentially reaching an audience of 595 million views in a single day.

● The false narrative asserting that Trump staged the shooting was predominantly disseminated on X. Numerous accounts suggested that Trump, anticipating an electoral loss to Biden, orchestrated the incident to attract more voters and alter the prevailing narrative in the United States.

● This theory was disseminated by influential accounts with large followings. For instance, the authentic X account @BlackKnight10k, which has over 250,000 followers, shared several tweets amplifying the false narrative, claiming that the assassination should be widely dismissed as a joke because of its lack of credibility. His tweets garnered numerous comments and reached a wide audience of over 5.3 million potential views, many of whom agreed and added that no one in the crowd was injured, further supporting the theory that the incident was staged.

● The 45% of fake accounts engaged in this specific false narrative infiltrated genuine conversations, amplifying their false theory to a wide audience. As well as original posts, the fake accounts also commented on posts from authentic profiles to gain more views and maximize their impact.

● One of the primary strategies of the fake accounts was to circulate negative hashtags about Trump on social media to promote the theory.

● Cyabra has also identified an image circulating on social media that depicts Trump smiling after the shooting. Upon analysis, it seems that the image is fabricated, with the smile edited in to falsely portray Trump as having orchestrated the assassination.

One might get the impression from the report that the “Trump staged the shooting” theory was an astroturfed phenomenon due, in no small part, to a number of fake accounts on X. I think that’s not correct. I, for example, am not on X, and when I first heard of the shooting, I immediately thought that it could be a false flag or somehow staged. I know that I’m super-cynnical and black-pilled, but I think that more and more people are “waking up” and questioning the narrative. Just my 2 cents.

4 Likes

I didn’t get that impression. I read this as just an analysis of how (dis-)information flows. They didn’t really attribute the false theories to any particular motivation. Maybe that could have been clearer.

Sure, and you probably also thought of a bunch of other possibilities: lone gunman, secret service conspiracy, russian/chinese manchurian candidate, random accident, etc. Same with everyone else as we’ve all seen the same movie plots. Then most rational people wait and see what evidence turns up evaluating it in accordance with the (individually different) probabilities we assign each of those cases. (Bayesian statistics strikes again.)

8 Likes

Fair point. Obviously, Musk’s comment was tongue-in-cheek. However, a nice resume is not necessarily an indication of competence. Affirmative Action virtue signaling has been going on long enough that even mediocrities can be wafted aloft by those updrafts. You need look no further than the incumbent vice president. Of course, this doesn’t necessarily mean Ms Cheatle is not well qualified but the question is valid in this environment.

As an aside, I recommend using sources other than Wikipedia for politically-charged topics.

Instead, try primary sources:

Most of the accomplishments mentioned in the Wikipedia article and not mentioned in her official bio.

But since we’re relying on Wikipedia, here’s a key quote from the page as it now stands, which supports the DEI conjecture:

Cheatle stated the Secret Service, which had a 48% departure rate, needed to “attract diverse candidates and give opportunities to everybody in the workforce, particularly women.” She said she aims to have 30% women in the agency by 2030.

6 Likes

For anyone who missed it, the incomparable Mark Steyn has an article about the Secret Service’s failure which is well worth your attention:
Shoots and Ladders :: SteynOnline

He debates the question – “the US Secret Service: In on it? Or just totally crap?

He points out that even in long-ago sadly-diminished England when the Ruling Class was caught unawares by Argentina’s attempted seizure of the Falkland Islands, the UK Foreign Secretary and two other government ministers immediately resigned to acknowledge their personal failure. With Biden’s Pepsi girl – no such acceptance of responsibility.

He also describes a similarly egregious Secret Service failure which he witnessed 20 years ago at a Laura Bush event in New Hampshire, where the back door to the event was literally left unguarded. Fortunately, there was no mind-numbed robot gunning for her on that occasion. Secret Service incompetence long pre-dates the Pepsi girl.

As for the recent event, apparently the Secret Service had diverted resources from President Trump’s rally to a Dr. Jill Biden appearance – priorities!

Will the Secret Service be cleaned out from top to bottom? Will those who failed accept their personal responsibility and be punished? Of course not! In today’s West, our Rulers are above reproach.

7 Likes

That’s fair.

True, but the fact that they outright pronounced it as a false theory, is a bit too much. How would they know whether the theory was true or not? I have to admit that that didn’t sit well with me—it activated the same mental circuits as the “fact checkers” did who ridiculed anyone who had concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine or that COVID-19 originated in a lab.

5 Likes

What a time to be alive!

3 Likes

Steyn has quite the way with words. Incomparable indeed.

4 Likes

Claims the Trump campaign did not ask for more SS protection.

If they actually did, the fight is gonna be interesting.

edit: archive link in case someone edit the original https://archive.ph/q4CPS

6 Likes

https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/wouldbe-assassin-thomas-matthew-crooks-spotted-on-roof-26-minutes-before-he-started-shooting-at-donald-trump-report/news-story/423cbd4020a6e2570fdc9042b851ea90

6 Likes

FBI technical specialists successfully gained access to Thomas Matthew Crooks’ phone, and they continue to analyze his electronic devices.

2 Likes

Nothing will happen. Nobody appointed by a Democrat President will be held accountable. They are following the same playbook they have for 40 years. The buck stops here and I am not resigning. Easy enough. What the left has leveraged for 40 years is the understanding that actually taking responsibility is a worse outcome than being held accountable by the voters since the voters don’t hold their own party accountable. It is worse to take responsibility such that it can be used against your party than to hold out and see if the voters will hold you accountable. In a couple years, you can claim the Afghanistan debacle was a win. But if you fire a few generals for poor performance, it is admitting that something bad happened while you were in charge.

This has worked for all those years because the media has been biased in holding the different politicians accountable. Since the primary source of information for voters was and is the media, if they do not hold a politician accountable then the voters will not hold the politician accountable.

Many on the right now have the same strategy. This is why they ignored things about Trump that previously would have been disastrous to a political candidate. They know the game that the left has been playing and want to play by the same rules.

I understand why the right wants to play by the same rules. It is only fair and logical, but it is a really bad set of rules if you want a prosperous country.

We somehow believe that the political parties will be able to hold each other accountable when in fact that is the job of the voters. The voters are unable to do so for some reason. Either we do not have the character or it is in fact a problem with the media. I don’t really claim to know, but what the right should be doing is holding the media accountable. This isn’t done by just pointing out obvious issues. It is not done simply by not watching or subscribing. It is done by holding the corporations that own the media outlets accountable by not buying their products.

Comcast should be punished by people cancelling their cable. ATT should be punished by people canceling their phone plans. Nobody on the right should take a Disney cruise, watch a Disney movie or visit a Disney property.

We would be better off donating to a fund that helps people switch from Comcast to Elon’s satellite system than donating to the Republican party or candidates.

6 Likes

Okay, come on, Trump has to thank the left-wing media in the first place for helping him win in 2016. Election Day - #7 by eggspurt

1 Like
8 Likes
5 Likes

I assume this is a reply to my post. It didn’t show as a reply to me.

I am not sure what your trying to argue? Based on your link it appears you are arguing that Trump was amplified by the media based on a Democratic strategy.
In short that a strategy to use the media to manipulate the American people back fired on them.

Is your argument that people should be happy because a manipulative system is ok because their candidate got elected? I am not much of an ends justifies the means kind of guy. In this particular case, it wouldn’t even be the ends justifying the means, it would be you got lucky once and the manipulation backfired.

7 Likes

About Ms. Cheat-us’s excuse that it was too dangerous to put an observer on the sloping roof of the building used by the shooter. (What? Someone might have got hurt? By failing to put a spotter on the roof, two people died, including the Leftie shooter, and 3 people got injured, including the presidential candidate it was Ms. Cheat-us’s job to protect): – there are now reports that some branch of law enforcement had operatives inside the building.

When a crow lands on the metal roof of that kind of building, the people inside hear it. When some crazed Leftie crawls on the roof dragging a rifle, it must have sounded like a major hail-storm.

It is just a shame there will never be an honest open investigation into what happened under Ms. Cheat-us’s direction.

7 Likes

Outside or special investigator? Vetted and confirmed by the Senate of course unlike our favorite Mr Smith

4 Likes

The thing about incompetent people is that eventually they step in it.
Look at the aerial photo posted by @drlorentz and compare the pitch of the roofs of the buildings the counter snipers were located and the pitch of the roof that was too “slopey”.

Edit: And also look at the building to the left of it which is the high point in that cluster of buildings. Maybe this building was too high or maybe too dirty. Upon inspection, there was some bird poop on these roofs. We also didn’t station anyone on the ladder to the roof because the air quality was kinda bad that day.

6 Likes

3 Likes

Sorry, couldn’t help myself.

6 Likes