Militia.Money is basically just Property Money (ie: money backed by property rights) with the critical parameter of “Sovereign” operationally defined.
Friedman and the rest of the “libertarian” crew never want to confront the foundation of property rights in force. By that I do not mean “force” as in “enforcement of property rights under contract”. That merely begs the question. Who enforces the very regime of contract law?
This is one reason for the provision:
All previous agreements between challenger and challenged are automatically suspended during the period of formal combat. There shall be no rules within the combat ground.
Charlie Kirk was starting to realize the fundamental “political” conflict was a conflict between ill-founded monetary regimes and total fertility rates because he had to talk to “young men” without the inspirational music of The Village People.
And then there is Milton Friedman…
AFAIK, Milton Friedman was the best economist we were permitted during the lifetime of Boomers.
That is damning with faint praise because his “best” was merely recognizing that land value tax was “the least bad tax”. But then he stops with the “no dead-weight loss” libertarian cope.
That’s right so far as it goes but it fails to recognize that when a “young man” can’t even carve out enough land to gather enough solar calories from the food chain to support a wife and at least 2.1 children:
