An article by Marcois on American Greatness today says data centers can be powered by Small Modular Reactors (SMR) and they really ARE small and compact, and don’t need huge pools for cooling.
So what are we waiting for?
I was disappointed when I heard JD Vance say he thought the opposition to data centers was, er, powered mainly by people’s concern that they would drive up energy costs. Oh JD, turn in your hillbilly overalls! Higher energy costs is just what desperate opponents mention to enlist people who don’t live too near a proposed data center site. In a rural (or formerly rural) area such as mine, people’s main concern is the destruction of the natural environment, the clear-cutting of hundreds of acres of forest. It’s the ugliness and the noise. Devastation of the huntin’ and the fishin’,Thats not what we moved here, or stayed here, for.
So dear Polymaths, COULD data centers be powered by a unit no bigger than a railroad car? And if so, would that mean they can just be put in areas presently zoned Industrial, instead of in areas zoned Conservation or Open Space? Or why not in skyscrapers in cities?
The article makes it sound like we already have SMRs, but if that’s the case , why are whatever companies build data centers challenging zoning ordinances and taking over forests, despite the frantic pleas of nearby residents?
Thank you for your attention to this matter!