We know that politicians are incapable of considering the long term effects of their policies, regardless of how utopian in their stated intent. Currently, there is growing - and increasingly forcefully censored - comment in Europe regarding intense dissatisfaction with what is now openly being called “reverse colonization. Of course, those in charge can only respond with the epithet “racist” to counter any questioning of mass migration. Assiduously ignored is the obvious fact that “migrants” from Islamic cultures bring with them social values thoroughly incompatible with Western democracy. No one disputes this fact on the merits. Again, the only ancer is epithets and ad hominem venom.
It is an indisputable fact that unlike Judaism or Christianity, Islam consists of a mandatory political as well as individual belief system. It is a total prescription for living, as in totalitarian, whose rules emanate directly from religious authorities. Not only is there no separation of church/mosque and state; the mosque is the state. Again, the truth here is not in serious dispute - however unfashionable our better try to coerce silence on anything even close to these in-your-face issues.
The question I’ve been asking myself (and it is more pertinent now, following Marco Rubio’s speech yesterday in Munich) is: what happens when - under even moderate demographic assumptions - the UK and France (two nations with substantial nuclear arsenals and sophisticated delivery systems) transition into Muslim majority nations? Again, under a moderate demographic prediction, this will happen in 2074 for the UK and 2088 for France.
Now, certainly the present leadership is constitutionally incapable of recognizing these inexorable demographic facts they have deliberately created and they have done so in the face of widespread disapproval of their native populations. They have refused to even debate the subject on the merits. As has been obvious for decades, the only answer is “RACIST”.
So, what is the likely to be geopolitical and strategic outcome of advanced nuclear weapons and delivery systems in the hands of a population which, by all appearances (and according to mandatory, explicit religious/political tenets) despises their hosts and the political system which welcomed and supported them, even as they refused to assimilate?
Nothing to see here? “Conspiracy theory”. Just continue to worry about global warming, misogyny, homo- & trans- phobia, “racism”, etc.? It seems to me a geo-strategic imbalance is in the making. Show me how I’m wrong.
