steve-bannon-once-suggested-only-property-owners-should-vote

I understand the black pill. If the US government thinks it can treat me like an enemy and then turn around and have me voluntarily support it, they have to be the stupidest people in history.

This doesn’t just apply to the government. One might say, my neighbors have such little brain capacity that they think they can force me to do something without consequence. They must live in some fantasy world called a metropolis where actions toward your neighbor have little or no immediate personal consequence.

I guess years of being able to take your neighbor’s property without consequence gives confidence, but not brain power. Maybe people forgot what a society requires and or don’t understand second order consequences. Thinking you can treat your neighbor as a milk cow allows you to get milk, but your neighbor is required for more than just milk. There are some things you cannot coerce.

Here is what ChatGPT says:

The phrase “the team quit on him” typically means that the members of a team have lost faith in, or stopped supporting, their leader or coach. It implies that the team’s performance or morale has declined as a result of this loss of support. In essence, it suggests that the team no longer believes in the ability or leadership of the person in charge, leading to a breakdown in cohesion and effectiveness.

For those of us that live in the real world and have to deal with real people and have been part of real communities, we all understand this without explanation. We have all seen the consequences of a “team quitting on him”. I always think of it like a mule team. The old mule team is pulling the cart and the guy on the cart is whipping the mule team and then all of a sudden there was one too many whips and the mules stop pulling the cart.

The definition of a tyrant is one that rules without constraint. The US government rules without constraint. It has unconstrained spending, unconstrained war and unconstrained law making. It runs unchecked.

The final check on the government was supposed to be voting. In order to vote, you need to be informed. In order to be informed you have to have free speech.

Mainstream media tries to insinuate that they are free speech, but they are not. As early, if not earlier, as the mid 1800s it was known that a politician had to pay the newspaper for support.

When the NRA gives its endorsement to a candidate, we all know that the NRA is a political organization and we all know what its goals are and why it would endorse a candidate. The media tries to hide its motivation. They are like the NRA except they are unethical and have a history of being bribed for political support and or controlled/used by the intelligence agencies.

It is hard to believe that people argue about whether the media is biased. It isn’t biased, it is an operation that is organized and synchronized towards a common purpose. People aren’t being informed, they are being led and manipulated. Just because they are smart enough to insure that there is political division between the people doesn’t mean they aren’t organized for a common purpose.

The thing to remember is that these are the pros. The difference between them and the normal citizen with regard to manipulation is similar to the difference between a normal citizen and some hall of fame pro athlete.

One of the advantages they have is that people don’t think they are manipulatable. They think others are manipulatable, but not them. I am too smart and logical to be manipulated. All this means is that you are more easily manipulatable because you are completely unaware of the danger.

You cannot have free and fair elections in a system where it is impossible to be informed. Most people will immediately react to this by thinking it is true because the other side is uninformed. They miss the point. Until you receive all media assuming it is bullshit unless you personally know the source, you have not got the point.

I previously saw the video you posted. I think it is probably true, but I force myself to ask how do I know that is true? I don’t. Is it really about vaccination or something else?

I try hard to take the same approach to things that confirm my bias as I do with the main stream media, but I don’t always succeed.

In the end, for me, it doesn’t matter if one video is true or not. I was witness to the mania. I saw how people treated their neighbors and long before COVID I was already asking myself why exactly would I commit to the US.

Why would I willingly sacrifice for some unknown person in Chicago or Tampa that doesn’t hold my values? A person likely to never be willing to sacrifice for me. A person that thinks it is a good idea to divide the country up into little groups and pit them against each other. A guy that doesn’t thank me for my contribution, but actually attacks my character and blames me for his problems.

For fun I changed up the CCR song Fortunate Son.

Some folks are born to burn our common flag
Ooh, they’re LGBTQ
And when it’s time to pull all together
They only wag their finger at you

It ain’t me, it ain’t me
I ain’t no fascist, son
It ain’t me, it ain’t me
I ain’t who burnt it down

Some folks inherit beady little eyes
Ooh, they take their “fair” share, Lord
And when you ask em, “Shouldn’t we all give together?”
Ooh, they only answer, “No, no, no.”

Some folks are born with my helping hand
Lord, don’t they help themselves, no
But when the taxman come to my door
They only ask for more, more, more

It ain’t me, it ain’t me
I ain’t your unpaid whore
It ain’t me, it ain’t me
I ain’t your free shit store

Some folks have taken everything they have
Why are they the victimized one, Lord
If you ask what have I done
They will only scream you down yea

It ain’t me, it ain’t me
I ain’t the bitching one
It ain’t me, it ain’t me
I ain’t who burnt it down

It ain’t me, it ain’t me
I ain’t the platformed one
It ain’t me, it ain’t me
I ain’t who burnt it down

5 Likes