Very strange. Dogs are not bears, people generally can read dogs’ intentions and stay away when sensing danger. Autism?
We’re not dealing with Labradoodles.
And he’s right back at it:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DLOIlZQMkOj/
Put him on the FBI’s most Annoying List or is it most Insufferable?
edit: Pallywood or Paliwood
Crowds on Demand is your home for impactful advocacy campaigns, demonstrations, PR stunts, crowds for hire and corporate events. Services available nationwide.
NYC in 2001: We will never forget!
NYC in 2025: elects Muslim jihadist
Soon enough this guy might be attending as well:
It turns out unbiased predictive models don’t exist, and if they do, they aren’t effective. But the contortions the bias police perform while they try to reach this ideal are painfully entertaining:
The complications do not end here: trying to improve fairness outcomes for one group can worsen them for another. Full-time parents, for instance, were already more likely to be wrongly flagged by the model (False Positive Rate) before reweighting than non parents. But after reweighting, the difference between the two groups increased rather than decreased. It appears that by making the model fairer based on migration/national background, the city inadvertently made it less fair for parents.
These are two sets of unavoidable tradeoffs: focusing on one fairness definition can lead to worse outcomes on others. Similarly, focusing on one group can lead to worse performance for other groups. In evaluating its model, the city made a choice to focus on false positives and on reducing ethnicity/nationality based disparities. Precisely because the reweighting procedure made some gains in this direction, the model did worse on other dimensions.
In November 2024, a tenured MIT professor posted online that a “Zionist ‘mind infection’ ” is being funded by “Jewish student life organizations” such as Hillel and Chabad.
When I pointed out that his message was extremely dangerous rhetoric, the professor began targeting me personally in X posts to his 10,000 followers. He did so over and over again. In his sixth post, for example, he referred to me as “an excellent case study.”
I sent the professor an email with a simple request: “Please leave me alone.” He then emailed the entire Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, including students and faculty, promising to use me in his upcoming seminar as a “real-life case study” of the Jewish “mind infection.”
He continued targeting me in a relentless series of mass emails, copying high-level administrators, including Kornbluth. In one of these emails, he stated that I have “powerful connections” to the media and to “influential friends in Congress like Rep. Elise Stefanik” — which is false.
The said professor:
Docket:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70629700/sussman-v-massachusetts-institute-of-technology/
Professor Michel DeGraff is a Haitian linguist and a tenured professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He is renowned for his work in Creole linguistics, particularly Haitian Creole, and for his advocacy in decolonizing education and promoting linguistic justice.
From Wikipedia:
Michel Anne Frederic DeGraff [1] (born 1963) is a Haitian creolist and a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). His scholarship focuses on Creole studies and the role of language and linguistics for decolonization and liberation.[2] He has advocated for the recognition of Haitian Creole as a full-fledged language.[2]
added:
from Grok…
Michel DeGraff, an MIT linguistics professor, and Will Sussman, a former MIT doctoral student and president of MIT Graduate Hillel, were involved in a highly publicized conflict that culminated in a federal lawsuit filed in June 2025. The dispute began in November 2024 when Sussman publicly criticized DeGraff on X, accusing him of posting “extremely dangerous rhetoric” about Jewish student groups like Hillel and Chabad, alleging they funded a “Zionist mind infection.” Sussman’s criticism stemmed from DeGraff’s Instagram post about a seminar speaker who claimed these groups promoted Zionism and targeted critics of Israel. DeGraff’s seminar, titled “Language and linguistics for decolonization and liberation and for peace and community building from the river to the sea in Palestine and Israel to the mountaintops in Haiti and beyond,” was controversial and initially rejected by MIT’s Linguistics department for lacking qualifications.
In response, DeGraff posted two tweets suggesting Sussman read anti-Israel activists’ work and claimed Jewish student groups acted against some Jewish students’ interests. Sussman emailed DeGraff, asking him to “please leave me alone.” Instead, DeGraff escalated, posting three more tweets accusing Sussman of inciting racist insults, plagiarism, antisemitism accusations, and threats. DeGraff also replied to Sussman’s email, copying others, repeating these accusations and demanding Sussman “cease and desist,” despite Sussman’s request for no further contact.
The conflict intensified, with DeGraff allegedly sending department-wide emails describing Sussman as a case study of a “Zionist mind infection” tied to Israeli propaganda. Sussman filed a complaint with MIT’s Discrimination and Harassment Response Office, which declined to investigate, arguing DeGraff’s comments critiqued Israeli propaganda, not Sussman’s Jewish identity. The lawsuit, filed by the Louis D. Brandeis Center, claims DeGraff’s harassment was so severe that Sussman left MIT in 2024, abandoning his PhD. It also alleges MIT failed to address antisemitic hostility, violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.
DeGraff’s actions extended beyond Sussman, as he allegedly harassed Israeli instructor Lior Alon by posting his personal information, including military service details, on social media, tagging outlets like Al Jazeera, and defaming him in a May 2024 Le Monde Diplomatique article. This led to further harassment of Alon in public spaces.
MIT removed DeGraff from the Linguistics department, reclassifying him as “Faculty-at-Large” in the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, and withheld his annual pay raise, citing disruptions. DeGraff claims he was unfairly punished for his pro-Palestinian activism and course content. Neither MIT nor DeGraff responded to comment requests, and legal proceedings are ongoing.
This account is based on available reports, primarily from the lawsuit and related coverage, which may reflect biases or incomplete perspectives. The situation remains contentious, with no final resolution reported as of July 2, 2025.
I recently got stopped & ticketed by the City of London Police for, & I kid you not, “cycling no handed”. Even though it’s clearly not an offence, the officer said they were ticketing me under the Human Rights Act as I was infringing other people’s Article 2 ‘Right to Life’, in… https://t.co/LU4BUKZZ4w pic.twitter.com/3DBE6XUgSN
— Paul Powlesland (@paulpowlesland) July 3, 2025
The female officer…