Yeah, 'cause Sweden is full of practitioners of the Religion of Peace. Inshallah.
It could mean; “…if the creeks don’t rise.” , but I doubt that.
Doing nothing is part of the clear pattern as to illegal aliens (they are not “migrants”). When we were a first world country, scrutiny of border crossers for communicable diseases was serious business. The answer there was also to ignore it and we have had occurrences of numerous previously unheard-of diseases - especially those endemic in central and South America. They remain little heard of - but that’s because public “health” officials (LOL) and their MSM accomplices do all they can to cover up any knowledge of the microbe invasion which inevitably accompanies millions of people just entering our country as they please. They, we’re told have the right to do so and we have the “privilege” of paying for them; that is the quickly shrinking portion of the native population (aka xenophobes and racists all) which actually obeys the law and actually pays taxes. The more lawlessness one witnesses, the less likely one it to obey, himself, no?
Incarcerate career criminals and crime especially violence and homicide decreases. It’s a mystery. Do you believe in miracles?
I feel a new referendum coming. If voters give the wrong answer, that calls for a do-over.
🚨 WOW! Iceland citizens are CELEBRATING EN MASSE after their nation has REJECTED joining the European Union
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) August 30, 2026
Turnout was over 82%
PROTECT YOUR SOVEREIGNTY! 🇺🇸🇮🇸
Not only should countries be rejecting joining — but nations should start PULLING OUT of the EU 🔥 pic.twitter.com/MXgOmJ9jk1
Celebrating bad things leads to more bad things:
https://www.newsnationnow.com/crime/north-dakota-mother-children-murder-case/
Murdering children is a logical outgrowth of “partial-birth abortion”, no?
Re. the pro Clancy hysteria, that has always been around:
Rose and Valerie, screaming from the gallery
Say he must go free
(Maxwell must go free)
The judge does not agree and he tells them
So, o, o, o.
Let’s see - we know government at all levels is failing us. The legal profession abandoned its principles and duty generations ago. Culture, as judged by “entertainment” and NGO’s is a steaming pile of excrement. Now juries, as the last remnant of at least the possibility of individual virtue, won’t convict a child killer and apparently the one juror (a male) who voted consistently to convict is being called out publicly by a so-called defense attorney. Such behavior explains the heads on spikes I just couldn’t understand as a kid when I read history.
Reportedly the jury in the Clancy murder case consisted of 9 women and 3 men – although it seems that 2 of the men might better be described as soy boys.
Statistically, what is the chance of selecting a predominantly female jury when the citizen population is approximately 50/50?
But we know that lawyers have perverted justice by playing games with who gets chosen to sit on a particular jury panel, instead of simply choosing 12 citizens at random. Clearly, the lawyers in this case did their best to select a biased jury pool – as shown by the result.
The bigger issue is that the legal profession has destroyed the confidence in the impartiality of the Law which had been built up over generations. Trust in the legal system has now been destroyed. Lawyers may game the system to get lots of money, but they no longer get any respect. Indeed, they no longer deserve any respect.
Kenyans Made a Living Writing College Essays. Then A.I. Arrived.
That’s why he’s a chief.
He graduated from the spam email scam it seems.
Yes, indeed. Now, as a general matter, I accept the proposition that mental illness may mitigate criminal intent in some instances. That said, there are jurisdictions which permit jury findings of guilty but mentally ill. In those jurisdictions, it is not a get out of jail free card - as it would be here.
Further, on the facts of this case, it becomes very difficult to imagine (temporary - a single instance - none before and none since) mental illness used to excuse three sequential acts of child murder by the actual hands of their mother. By a tortured stretch, one might possibly imagine mental illness the cause had she used a firearm. But to sequentially literally squeeze the life out of three small children - nope. That’s as evil as evil can be. But we must remember Mass is the state where the murder of newborns is celebrated in the governor’s office. Speaking of loss of trust in the law and lawyers: the distinction between a newborn with legal personhood and a “fetus” with no rights at all, hangs on the lawyerly distinction of its geographic relationship with the “birth canal” of the “birthing person”. If so much as a toe remains in the “birthing person’s” vagina: the fetus has zero rights (expectation of continuing life in lawyerly jargon). Once that few grams of flesh has emerged: this is suddenly a legal personhood, to which myriads of possible acts of “abuse” may attach. Only a modern American lawyer could have created such an astoundingly absurd set of “laws” - evolving toward (as has been said by someone smarter than me: “That which is not prohibited is mandatory”. We’re almost there.