The Media Lie About Everything

The title of this post is incomplete. The media lie (by omission & commission), misrepresent, and exaggerate everything. I realize this is news to no one here. Nevertheless, this makes a useful example of how the deception is carried out.

Hurricane Helene passed by Tampa Bay on Thursday (26SEP2024) evening at about 21:00 local time. At this time, the eye was about 100 miles west of Tampa. This fact is somewhat misleading since the winds (and other effects) of a hurricane are greatest far from a hurricane’s eye. Tampa did not experience the hurricane’s highest winds nor the most intense rain. Peak sustained winds were only about 50 mph, gusting to 70 mph (see figure below). However, because of the large extent of this hurricane, which dominated the weather hundreds of miles from the eye, storm surge was significant.

While I rarely dip into the local legacy media outlets for obvious reasons, this event seemed worthy of an exception. The picture one gets from articles such as this is that the entire area was underwater: Hurricane Helene wasn’t a direct hit in Tampa Bay but it sure felt like it (archived version).

Helene’s center passed no nearer than 100 miles off the coast of Pinellas County, but the enormous hurricane pushed ashore record storm surge ravaging coastal homes and businesses and flooding low-lying neighborhoods beyond any storm in memory.

I live one mile from the shore of the Gulf of Mexico. We did not lose power, though about one third to one half of our county did — about which more later. The morning after the storm, I got up in the roof to check for damage and to clear the rain gutters. A couple of sections of fence had fallen down but with the help of a neighbor and our wives, we got everything back in order.

About 12 hours after the storm passed, my wife and I went for bike ride along the trail near the shore. There was some debris on the trail: leaves and branches. We had breakfast at a restaurant within a half mile of the beach. A street a couple of miles away was flooded to about 2 feet depth. Kids were riding through the water on their bikes: probably not the best idea. By this morning (10:00 28SEP), all the flooding was cleared up. County workers were clearing debris on the bike trail.

As of this time, about 48 hours after the storm’s passage, power had been restored to about 70% of the residences that lost it in the storm. The barrier islands are still having problems: road closures and power outages. But the vast majority of the region is back to normal, or what passes for normal. The airports opened within about 24 hours.

Was it a bad storm? Yes. Is the area devastated? No. People are tough and help each other out. This is not to say that was no real suffering and death. There was. The local and state governments performed well. Thank goodness we didn’t have to wait for Johnny Fed to come to the rescue. But mostly, people took care of themselves and of each other. No whinging; just put your head down and get to work.

For those of you who enjoy disaster porn, the local pier was destroyed by the storm. Picture taken 13:24, 27SEP while on my afternoon bike ride.

11 Likes

Do you have a problem with media generating sensationalism to get more clicks and drive more ad pennies dished out by Google to their diminishing revenues?

1 Like

It never fails to surprise — though by this point the surprise should have dissipated — to see someone imply that sensationalism began with Google and that Google is its principal driver. The reality is that the Regime has used sensationalism in the mainstream (now legacy) media to influence public opinion to further its ends. The incentives were not solely financial, although money was used to grease the gears.

Operation Mockingbird was a Cold War era program to do just that. The Church Committee’s report documented the relationship between the CIA and the media:

Published in 1976, the committee’s report confirmed some earlier stories that charged that the CIA had cultivated relationships with private institutions, including the press. Without identifying individuals by name, the Church Committee stated that it found fifty journalists who had official, but secret, relationships with the CIA.

Of course, the sensationalism and lying date back much further than the post-WWII era. Yellow journalism provides a plethora of examples. Pulitzer and Hearst sensationalized the sinking of the USS Maine (1889) to help the Regime justify making war on Spain. Ironic that the most prestigious journalism prize in the US is named for a yellow journalist. A few decades later, Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for lying about the Soviet Union and the Holodomor. It’s telling that the Pulitzer Board refused repeated calls, over the course of many years, to retract the prize in the face of clear evidence of fraud. Other examples abound.

One could argue that the situation has improved in the Internet era because the information bottleneck is broken. A few media outlets once controlled which stories were reported and how they were presented. Over the last decade or so, the information oligopoly has lost its hold on the information space. Sure, there are still Regime bots or social influencers who try to manage the narrative but they are decreasingly effective as the public has gotten wise to them.

Does anyone still rely on Google search these days? Certainly, a significant minority of the public have abandoned entities such as Facebook and Google to find out what’s going on. As an aside, note that I referenced a legacy media outlet (Tampa Bay Times), not Google — not that those are faring any better. The West is becoming a collection of low-trust societies in which all institutions are viewed skeptically. As George Gilder noted, there will be Life After Google.

4 Likes

Thinking that the contributors to this thread might want to join this upcoming initiative at UC Berkeley:

How can AI be leveraged to enhance trust and boost media engagement within local communities?

​Join UC Berkeley Journalism for a dynamic weekend that will unite journalists, documentary filmmakers, technologists and designers to explore this question. Our audience needs accurate information to make important decisions about their lives and communities. Yet, AI-generated content will make it increasingly difficult for the public to distinguish between authentic and artificial content.

​AI also offers powerful tools for strengthening journalism and the field of documentary filmmaking, from advanced fact-checking to authenticating media and developing new stories, tools and platforms for deeper audience engagement.

​The Hackathon

​The AI Journalism hackathon will bring together thinkers, innovators and change makers, from the Berkeley campus, media organizations and beyond. Over the course of the weekend, we’ll examine AI’s impact on audience trust and engagement—both its challenges and opportunities—while collaborating to envision and prototype new solutions.

​Our goals are to:

  • ​Build tools, stories, and platforms that reinforce public trust in media
  • ​Create innovative audience experiences across media platforms
  • ​Build stronger connections between media and the communities they serve
  • ​Share a suite of tools and learning opportunities

Whether you’re a developer, journalist or documentary filmmaker, this is your chance to contribute to a more trustworthy and dynamic media landscape.

1 Like

There is only one way an individual or institution can earn trust and that is to be trustworthy. These groups are a massive cope. They believe someone can lose credibility simply because someone else says they are wrong. That social media with the help of Russia has been their downfall. Journalism has lost credibility because they have been biased to the point of activism. Social media has accelerated the loss in trust as for once in modern history an average citizen has a voice and can respond by pointing out the obvious BS that these institutions spew.

It doesn’t take the Russians or social media. Anyone that takes the time to stop and question the “stories” they are being told will realize that indeed it is indeed just a story.

Certainly there are people that will believe anything, but these groups believe or at least try to make us believe that the vast majority of citizens are morons. I stand with the founders on free speech. The average Joe can distinguish lies when given information. I would take my chances with free speech before I would ever endorse a captured system that knowingly lies.

We need these institutions, but only if they function as we hope they would function. It appears they will blow themselves up before they will do their job in an ethical way.

3 Likes

Massive cope indeed. Imagine: the very same people who trained the chuckleheads who destroyed the credibility of the press are the ones who are going to restore that credibility. Needless to say, the academy is beyond broken — the humanities and social sciences especially.

Historically, members of the press were drawn from humble backgrounds and learned their trade by doing, rather than by attending a journalism school. The job title reporter was somewhere between used car salesman and carney barker. It was a low-prestige, unpretentious job. Everyone understood the press was biased and no one pretended otherwise. Imperfect as it was, the marketplace of ideas flourished in a cacophony of conflicting voices. Certainly, a few of the larger outlets were able to promote certain narratives, as documented above, but there was not the total control that prevailed in the latter part of the 20th century and into the early part of the 21st.

The Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism was founded in 1967. The granddaddy of them, Columbia School of Journalism is much older but most reporters didn’t go to college, much less graduate school, until recently. Oh, how did we get along with those untrained rubes as reporters before the Journalism Enlightenment??? The principal function of journalism schools, and the academy in general, is to groom the nation’s youth to be good little Regime operatives, toeing the official line and making sure that nobody strays outside the narrow boundaries set by the Regime, i.e., woke postmodern ideology.

3 Likes

Beautifully written, @Mettelus.

An appropriate metaphor for the response of media to the loss of their audience are the seven stages of grief, based on the work of Swiss psychiatrist Dr. Elisabeth KĂĽbler-Ross:

  1. Shock and disbelief: The initial phase where the mind responds to a stressful situation by becoming numb or unresponsive
  2. Denial: A stage where a person may avoid processing the reality of the situation
  3. Anger: A stage where a person may feel fed up and angry about the situation
  4. Bargaining: A stage where a person may try to win back the person they lost
  5. Depression: A stage where a person may experience depression and loneliness
  6. Reconstruction: A stage where a person may work through their grief
  7. Acceptance: A stage where a person realizes they can’t change the circumstances, but they can gain control over how they respond

Folks who survived in the wild were quick to go into anger, and who didn’t linger in denial. I fear left-wing media is stuck in denial about losing their audience, not understanding why – trying to “persuade and influence” instead of actually trying to get better at their mission.

1 Like