Not noticing patterns is at the heart of Our Democracy™. The powers long ago figured out the power of the “limited hangout”. I first saw it when Comey exonerated saint hillary by focusing on only the classified nature of the documents in question and callin it “careless”.
Now Hillary may be many things. One of thise it NOT “careless”. By stressing the “classified” documents which were “carelessly” mishandled, he intentionally mis-directed us from asking why she illegally use a private server in the first place. You don’t need to be a genius or political schemer to figure that out. She wanted her materials unobtainable under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (You can rest assured that Hillary opposes anything with the word “freedom” attached - unless it’s hers).
She committed two obvious felonies, never mentioned. First, she destroyed (“you mean ‘wiped’ like furniture?” - she coyly asked) various memory devices - actually caused other to perform the physical acts, of course. Shockingly, these devices were already under subpoena! Any lawyer will tell you that doing such a thing is like touching the NYC subway’s third rail. It is a "go to jail, go directly to jail; do not pass ‘go’, do not collect $200 (dems at her level require exponents of quantify their stealth finances).
Then there is the little question asked by any serious prosecutor - asked before the jury, if (s)he want a conviction: “Why”?? Why create a private server in a closet in her home? It’s elementary, my dear Watson (IBM, not Sherlock). Hide materials from FOIA requests, which pertain only to government documents stored/processed on government computers. Her co-conspirators (indicted or non-indicted), then, included everyone who replied using that obviously non-government email address. In legalese, this is perpetrating a fraud on the US government.
But saint comey was merely concerned with the handling of classified documents. Following Durham’s much anticipated investigation. We were not supposed to notice the pattern - “Durham concluded that review in 2023, which harshly criticized the bureau’s handling of the investigation into Trump” - Tulsi Gabbard. The obvious felonies committed by hillary, subsequently covered up comey, and those rolled up into a nice packet - were again covered up by Durham! He might well have characterized the crimes he saw for what they were and said the obvious: they were treasonous - an attempted coup “Our Democracy™” be damned (it surely is, if this doesn’t result in life sentences for all involved. It all but certainly involves HRH Barack Hussein Obama. Recall the manufactured “crimes” with which Trump, a former POTUS, was charged. Ask yourselves what should Obama face - in light of the democrat-initiated lawfare against Trump. Here are real, calculated, conspiratorial (with many acts in furtherance), treasonous activities of the entire upper echelon of an outgoing administration.
Publicize the pattern. Indict, try, and jail them all.
