EVERYWHERE this week, from “conservative” sources, I encounter the proposition that our society cannot be sustained as it was conceived without “morality”—and morality cannot exist without “religion”. George Washington sez so in his farewell address, and Franklin Graham sez so on Fox. See Roger Kimball’s piece on American Greatness today, “Then and Now”.
It’s clear what creed Graham means. Washington the Deist undoubtedly meant simply a Creator-God.
Washington didn’t need to be prescient to so opine about that: as Robespierre had found out a few years earlier, you can’t maintain civil authority and impose order unless the people believe in an even higher authority. Having banished God from France, Robespierre had to speedily re-open diplomatic relations with the Supreme Being.
As above, so below.
But, I’m finding it frustrating. To me it sounds like: “Christmas has never been the same since I stopped believing in Santa.”
Very true. And as Oscar Wilde said, “Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit: touch it and the bloom is gone.” The fact is, we can’t go back to swimming in what Arnold in his over-quoted poem called “the sea of faith”, any more that I can will myself to still believe in Santa Claus.
The other aspect of this is that the Right seems to think that now we are without religion. Maybe WE are, but, despite the fact that we keep calling Wokeism and Climate Eschatology “religions”, and every commentator presents this as though he/she had just,and alone, conceived the idea., it’s nothin* new. Actually, I think it’s well known that in the Soviet Union Communism was structured and presented in the image of traditional religion.
But - I don’t think we realize that they really are religions.
THEY are now that which Washington said we must have.
People on the Right seem to think this is a devastating point. Like “You think you’re so smart, but YOU’re religious, too, just like us! “ The ultimate comeback, y’know, like “I’m rubber, you’re glue…” it’s kinda embarrassing.
The real,problem is, WE gotta get a creed, too. Maybe a whole new one; I don’t think the Enlightenment ideas of our founders are gonna cut it. As Chomsky now says, the social Justice gospel is what the Enlightenment was preaching all along. When we quote Washington , Jefferson, et al, we are trying to say ,”This far, and no farther”.
And only a Supreme Being can make THAT stick.