I’m as “religious” as the next guy if not more so, but the difference between us is that I recognize what you call “Jesuit-bankster brainwashing” as just one tiny aspect of The Problem dragging some of us kicking and screaming (and others of us full of passionate intensity to quote Yates) toward a historic rhyme with The Thirty Years War unless we all stand down from babbling at each other about our “lived experience” – which, in the case of “the varieties of religious experience” is not very subject to scientific replication. I don’t fault folks like you for your passionate intensity so much as I do The Church Ladies (of all sexes) of Political Correctness because it is they who have de facto power over the rest of us and are the equivalent of a supremacist theocracy that will not relent until we’re all killing each other by the tens of not hundreds of millions.
I suspect you would be quite willing to abide by the minimalist rules for Sortocracy, which would permit you and those with whom you can communicate about your lived experiences a fair amount of physical land value upon which to live as you see fit to raise your children to fertile adulthood – where ya’ll understand what each other mean when you speak of “Our Lord the Sun” and such without tormenting the rest of us with our lack of faith in your words.
But, like the rest of us, centralization of social policy has made supremacists of us all as a matter of self defense. So we end up wanting to kill each other unless we are not yet in a state of utter desperation about the Church Ladies of Political Correctness coming after our children.
I get it.
But do you???
The following are the minimalist rules for Sortocracy as incorporated into the (meta) Ecclesiastical Law of The Fair Church(SM) here in Iowa which has as a primary purpose, the prevention of the horror of a Thirty Years War using contemporary technologies against cities. Why cities? They are chasms that have opened up The Gates of Hell from which billows smoke that, when more carefully examined, consists of those Church Lady Harpies with their syringe tipped pitchforks loaded with puberty blockers:
The Fair Church℠ subjects Fair Ecclesia, to only these constraints, so-as to protect the relationship between parents and their children, as well as the relationship between mortal Goðs and the immortal Goð:
-
Its ecclesiastical law must be published in a single document that, if in printed form, can be read and held in the hand of adults consenting to its conditions. The document must be completely self-contained. Any words not in the vernacular must be defined. The definitions must rely only on the vernacular, at least indirectly through other provided definitions. This it must assert to be the sole and total expression of its intents and purposes, and of its mechanisms for bringing conforming pressures on all members or subordinate Fair Ecclesia. There can be no rule of law, and consequently no law-abiding adults, unless the law is clearly stated.1
-
It must not impede the physically harmless departure of any member and their children, not given up for adoption, upon formal request. This includes members it is excommunicating2, but does not include invaders nor those resisting excommunication, thence exile. Mothers have priority over pre-adolescent children in disputes with fathers. Upon adolescence, choice is left to the nascent adult.
-
Its ecclesiastical territory consists of non-enclaves dynamically reapportioned by competitive bid with other Fair Ecclesia. Bidding authority is established by a census of its members.3
-
A minimum of 10% of its bidding authority must be toward territories for Natural Ecclesia.4
-
The census of Natural Ecclesia grants additional territorial authority apportioned according to bids on their behalf.5
-
It must not impede, though it need not facilitate, non-invasive passage by natural persons. Non-invasive passage is characterized by the absence of substantial social or ecological impact. Impediment is characterized by rendering passage substantially less practical.6
-
Its members are obligated to neutralize, by the most practical means available, impediments to the dogma.7
1 This constraint is derived from the book “Man’s Relation to Government”, section “The One Alternative To Bloody Revolution” by Melvin Gorham, ISBN 0-914752-16-2, Sovereign Press, 326 Harris Road, Rochester, WA 98579. An exemplar for this kind of ecclesiastical law is given below, under “Natural Ecclesia: Language For Ecclesiastical Natural Law”, which also defines the term, “Natural Ecclesia” as used herein.
2 Excommunication is strictly relative to the excommunicating Fair Ecclesia. The Fair Church℠ does not excommunicate. The Fair Church℠ is, in this sense, ultimately inclusive. However, those excommunicated from all other Fair Ecclesia are restricted to Natural Ecclesia.
3 This allots each adult with territory necessary for replacement reproduction, hence mitigating, not eliminating, the biological imperative for war. It does not exclude semi-enclaves, nor does it exclude intercine wars, as the appeal of last resort in inter-ecclesia dispute processing. In this respect, an ecclesium is sovereign in relation to other ecclesia, similar to The Treaty of Westphalia’s notion of the nation-state under the doctrine of Cuius regio, eius religio.
4 The intent is similar to that set forth by The Half-Earth Project.
5 This further expands the territory of Natural Ecclesia as more of humanity is subject to individual selection.
6 This is the necessary and sufficient condition to implement the originally-limited intent of the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution, as well as facilitate emigration. This naturally excludes pene-enclaves consistent with the intent of §3
7 This is the obligation to serve in Holy War for Individual Integrity.