Austin of Kabul has revealed the strategy our Betters are pursuing is to use the proxy war in the Ukraine to “weaken Russia”. This invites comparison to the successful weakening of the USSR undertaken in the Reagan/Bush years, leading to its (fortunately peaceful) collapse in 1991.
One of the stories floated about the collapse of the USSR was that President Reagan’s push for the very expensive Strategic Defense Initiative (dismissed by the Usual Suspects as “Star Wars”) had set up a technological challenge beyond the USSR’s ability to compete. But this seems to have been a tangential issue.
Peter Schweizer presented a more plausible explanation in his 1994 book “Victory: the Reagan Administration’s secret strategy that hastened the collapse of the Soviet Union”, ISBN 978-0871135674. The USSR in the mid-1980s was highly dependent on revenues from oil exports. In 1985, President Reagan did a deal with the King of Saudi Arabia under which the Saudis flooded the oil market and drove down the oil price. The drop in oil export revenues weakened the USSR and led to its collapse.
The late Yegor Gaidar, who was acting prime minister of Russia after the collapse of the USSR, provided a more complete picture in his article “The Soviet Collapse: Grain and Oil” published in 2007: 09-21440 OTI Gaidar.qxd (aei.org)
Soviet agriculture was very inefficient, such that the USSR in the 1980s had to import large amounts of grain to feed its population. As long as the price of oil was high, the USSR’s strong earnings from oil exports easily covered the costs of those essential grain imports. When the price of oil dropped due to the Saudi action, the USSR developed an unsustainable Trade Deficit and ran through its financial reserves paying for imported grain in only a few years. The USSR tried to borrow money from international lenders in 1989 to cover the grain imports, but this effort failed. By 1991, the USSR was bankrupt – collapse followed.
There is a lot of ruin in a nation, as Adam Smith observed. It took about 5 years of low oil prices on top of decades of Soviet agricultural malpractice to bring down the USSR. We are all very lucky that the USSR did not turn to military adventurism when it was pushed against the wall. It is worth noting that President Reagan’s victory over the USSR was not costless: the low oil prices also caused substantial collateral economic damage to oil producers in the US, Canada, the North Sea, and several countries in Africa and South America – not that anyone cares about oil producers or their shareholders, workers, & suppliers.
Can Austin of Kabul’s attempt to weaken Russia work in a similar way to President Reagan’s weakening of the USSR?
There are obvious differences in the situations. Russia is now a grain exporter, able to feed its population. Russia is unencumbered by the former Soviet Republics, which are now a burden on the US/EU side. Saudi Arabia is working with Russia this time, benefitting from the sanctions-induced high price of oil, which is also driving up Russia’s positive Trade Balance. Despite Western economic sanctions, the possibility of a Russian economic collapse in the foreseeable future seems rather remote.
Today, it seems the US economic position may be more perilous. The US National Debt now stands at about 125% of GNP – proportionately about three times larger than in the mid-1980s. The US has a giant & increasingly unsustainable Trade Deficit, now approaching $1 Trillion per year. Persian Gulf countries are starting to sell oil in Yuan as well as Dollars. At some point, foreign lenders might decide that the US is no longer a good place to park their funds. European nations which mostly benefitted from low oil prices in the later 1980s are now suffering from high oil prices and even higher gas prices – with the fear that sufficient gas may not be available at any price next winter if they continue to support the US proxy war in the Ukraine.
An interesting speculation: could the Russians be gambling that, this time around, the US might be the one to find itself on the wrong end of the economic push & pull?
As the proxy war grinds slowly on towards next winter, the US may find some of the Europeans breaking away and seeking a negotiated peace, while Russia continues to get quiet support from China, India, Brazil and much of the rest of the world. A US pull back from the Ukraine proxy war would put the future of NATO in doubt (accomplishing a key Russian objective) and make it plain to Taiwan that they should not count on assistance from the US (providing a major win to China).
It certainly is high stakes poker – providing “Our Guys” don’t foolishly trigger a nuclear war in the meantime.