Up first, The King of Beers:
Our Scanalyst ratings system is -5 to 5.
I give it a 2 as an adequate ad with no glaring problems.
2 Likes
Maybe stupor bowl commercials are different, but about half the ones I “see” (I try to not see or hear them and I’ve honed that skill), I can’t tell what is the product they’re trying to sell. Full of sound and fury and signifying nothing. Kind of like lefty performance art/political posturing.
5 Likes
A step up from that Bud Light tranny.
Thus, the Scanalyst scale offers negative numbers.
1 Like
Painfully bad:
I’ll give it a 3 for channeling movies past:
1 Like
As to the original post, I agree, it’s a 2, but just maybe a 2.25.
Now as reference, you may want to view this assortment…
3 Likes
Greater love hath no man than that he watch SuperBowl ads so I don’t have to.
5 Likes
You could be forced to watch the Halftime show.
3 Likes
Conveys a message to the constipated-American community. But will it turn other customers away?
I give it a 1.
2 Likes
Our first -2:
Ignores the real problem.
1 Like
Another 2:
2 Likes
Any commercial using an Elvis song starts at a 3. This ends there:
2 Likes
We have a 4:
2 Likes
Why?
I hear on the news today that the halftime show will be in Spanish
If I want to hear Spanish I just go to the grocery store or nearly any store in NEPA.
1 Like
Damn them, xfinity, may they be branded as the old Bell Telephone company was and be broken up.
do you get the impression I don’t like them?
3 Likes
A low 2:
2 Likes
4 for being memorable:
VW with a 2:
Sorry but all of these Super Bowl commercials suck: crappy music, stupid products, gratuitous diversity.
Even this re-imagined version of the original 1984 ad (directed by Ridley Scott) is better.
If Grok made a 1984 Super Bowl commercial. My $1M Grok Imagine submission. https://t.co/GMDT90g4jD pic.twitter.com/NCT7jiJ6Sz
— Joma Tech (@jomatech) February 6, 2026
1 Like