Idiots enjoy saying stochastic because it makes them feel smart. I said stochastic so that means you have to take me seriously
5 Likes
I hadda look it up. It means “random”, correct? I don’t understand it as employed.
Welp—y’gotta hand it to the Dems. Last week the news cycle was ALL about Trump. That “fight “ photo was everywhere! And then the convention, the wondrous, engaging, tremendously fun show of unity!
And THIS Monday morning?
All we see is Kamala. Everywhere. On every channel.
DAMN they’re good……
7 Likes
Stochastic means random
Stochastic is the domain of statistics, math and economics
Brave search AI provide a good explanation
In college, I thought about taking a class on stocastic process (math department). After the first day, I realized this will not be an easy class… drop and find something easier
5 Likes
Okay so what do they mean by “random terrorism”? What people say is not random, they say it intentionally.
5 Likes
Stochatic terrorism as defined by the left is terrorism incited by conservatives criticizing leftist politicians or groups.
Stochastic terrorism refers to the public demonization of a person or group, resulting in the incitement of a violent act that is statistically probable but whose specifics cannot be predicted. This phenomenon involves indirect, vague, or coded language that allows the instigator to plausibly disclaim responsibility for the resulting violence.
The term is total BS and it’s only applied to the right. For instance, Antifa and BLM or Thomas Crooks cannot be guility of stochastic terrorism.
Stochastic terrorism as defined by the left is not random.
4 Likes
Thanks! And if that’s the case, I’d certainly classify constantly calling Trump Hitler, and visually representing him as Hitler, as “stochastic terrorism”!
Isn’t it a common fantasy, the scenario where Hitler gets terminated before he becomes Hitler? Visiting Passau, where he lived a s a child, we heard the tale of how li’l Adolph fell into the icy Riner Inn, and a slightly older boy (who grew up to be a priest) pulled him out!
When that manly lad’s fingers closed around the collar of the shivering, blue-lipped toddler, they clenched the awful fate of millions who died in torment!
Who would not want to have been there on the riverbank that day, to take the adolescent hero off for a cocoa, show him a porn magazine, or sump’n, before he could effect the rescue?
5 Likes
This is a very well done exhibition of shooting - for civilians who know nothing about shooting. One need have no shooting experience to recognize the effects, difficulties, and terminal results of the various calibres fired.
The un-magnified red dot shot is exactly as you would experience the usual 2 MOA red dot at the range, fired at a target 1-200 yds away. A .300 WinMag is rather overkill for those distances; one reason most PD’s have converted to 5.56 NATO for their sniper requirements, as most shots in a city scenario requiring sniper use are less than 100 m away. The .300 WinMag has a case capacity oi about 71-72 gr of powder; it’s baby sister, the .30-'06, has a case capacity of only 41 gr. The usual hunting load of a .30-'06 is a 168 gr bullet, flying at approx. 2800 FPS; the .300 WinMag round fires a 188 gr bullet (same .308 diameter) bullet at about 3,000 FPS.
5 Likes
Gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks and US Air Force veteran Bill Jenkins, 63, signed up for the same intermediate handgun - pistol 2 class at the Keystone Shooting Center in Cranberry, Pennsylvania on June 22.
5 Likes
3 Likes
That brings us back to the question of whether individuals drive history … or whether history drives individuals. The likely answer is that both are factors.
Germany post-WWI was a mess. Blame the French and the English, who bamboozled President Wilson into going along with vicious Versailles Euro-style kicking of the loser while he is down. If there had been no Adolf, Germany would still have been a mess – and something else (maybe worse) would have arisen as a reaction to that French/English over-reach.
Perhaps a Communist regime would have arisen in Germany, then joined the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and taken over France & England. They could have called it the “European Union”.
7 Likes
This is wild
Oversight PR is affiliated with Heritage
2 Likes
Yes, well, we don’t know what MIGHT have happened. We only know what DID happen.and it’s that which we fantasize could have been prevented. (Fantasize, I said…)
6 Likes
Allegedly the shooter was killed by a different, not in camera, sniper team shooting .308 NATO. I have no clue as to the truth of this, but it would explain the reduced damage seen.
6 Likes
Well, itr really depends upon who the sniper was. If he was local PD, then I would expect a 5.56, with some outside chance of a 7.62 NATO round. But those tend to have legs, and in built-up environments not “formally” war zones that would be a drawback. If, OTOH, it was an SS sniper, then .300 WinMag would not at all be out of the running. Many of the Marine sniper rifles, even back in Nam, were .300 WinMags for the legs.
What is galling is that nothing is being released to the public. NOTHING. No shooting footage, no ballistic results, no crime scene photos (?were any even taken) - nothing. We don’t even know how many bullets were recovered.
Government agencies often just suck.
10 Likes
Even if they were being honest, it’ll take some time to get results. There’s gonna be a team that goes over every inch of the area, counting bullets and looking for clues. That’ll take a few days, minimum. Then there gonna run them through the lab, and that’ll take a bit. Writing up a report and the inevitable internal political tangles over who’s name is on it. edit: Then another team is going to have to get all the paperwork concerning the event and go through it with a copy of the (possibly contradictory) official procedures at their side. And then there are the debriefings, interviews, and interrogations of personnel and other witnesses.
And of course if they aren’t honest, there will be days of trying to decide just how to slant the report. Possibly time to blackmail the SS or do favour horse trading. Deciding scapegoats, etc.
6 Likes
All true. But also all a function of elevating “the investigation” to some immortal plane, where no one can possibly learn ANYTHING - for fear of “jeopardizing the investigation”. One would think we’re talking some highly religious cloistered act. But no, it’s just “hiding the light”.
?Why can’t we be informed. It might reduce just how little we have come to believe most anything said by our government, no matter what level we speak of. And that’s a very unfortunate result, because freedom requires open and honest debate on a wide variety of subjects. My sense is the real fear is the People discovering just how incompetent the government really is.
6 Likes
Incompetence and a cover-up, as you stated above nothing is being release to the public, nothing, so why is nothing being released? What are they hiding? What is so important that the public can’t see it?
3 Likes
I watched a bit of Cheatle’s testimony, and what struck me was her absolute self-confidence. I have no doubt she DID the job she was instructed to do by her superiors, and/or THEIR superiors: expose Donald Trump to mortal peril. Then let Congress yell at you for awhile; what do you care? You will be taken care of.
Funny thing to me is: doesn’t she know what usually happens to the faithful dogsbody who serves evil? Kim, there’s a rope, a car accident, idk what, but something lethal, in your very near future.
8 Likes
Citizen Free Press said she would resign on Monday (yesterday). She resigned today (close enough).
I love how she had no idea the head of Secret Service resigned after Reagan was shot in 1981 March 30. Ro Khanna, a progressive Dem from Silicon Valley, pointed this out.
Is Pepsi or Frito-Lay going to hire her back? No one should hire this terrible woman for at least 12 months.
5 Likes
I think she answered the question didn’t she? Your under oath. Do you know what time the sun rises? 6 am. That is not being wrong. That is a lie. The question isn’t asking for your best guess.
I guess lying under oath is just another thing that has to rise to a certain level to be considered lying under oath.
These scum bags only use I cannot recall when they know the answer but don’t want to say. But when asked a simple question, they cannot respond, I cannot recall. They go with a lie.
Edit: I just checked it again. She said he remained on duty. Not even, I think or I recall. No qualifiers.
5 Likes