That big, fat, crazy cat lady needs to be institutionalized.
Researchers at the city’s university are entering their 18th year of the Born in Bradford study. It’s one of the biggest medical trials of its kind: between 2007 and 2010, researchers recruited more than 13,000 babies in the city and then followed them closely from childhood into adolescence and now into early adulthood. More than one in six children in the study have parents who are first cousins, mostly from Bradford’s Pakistani community, making it among the world’s most valuable studies of the health impacts of cousin marriage.
What? One third of children born to “normal” (i.e. not first cousin) parents do not have a “probability of reaching a good stage of development”!
Bradford, we have a problem. Truly, England has lost the plot.
I have an idea of who might be marrying their cousins in Britain such that it needs to be studied with the hope of concluding nothing wrong with it.
25 years ago half of England could trace their lineage to William the Conqueror. That ratio is much lower now.
Asked and answered. From the BBC piece:
Of 5,127 babies of Pakistani origin, 37% had married parents who were first cousins, compared to less than 1% of married couples nationally.
Yeah but it won’t make them any smarter or more helpful.
Ya think? When will people gag at the hypocrisy? (Not holding my breath.)
They may need to delete the first law of robotics from Optimus:
https://x.com/ResisttheMS/status/1899895492533727621
Ready for more glaring hypocrisy? Here you go:
(Warning; may induce symptoms ranging from nausea to blind rage.)
my favorite comment
edit: we can no longer preview X posts and comments? I changed url from x to twitter
It’s never been about saving the rainforest anyway. The green initiatives are mostly a money-laundering operation similar to USAID.
Money laundering uses less water than actual laundering. I have consulted my Chinese sources
Indeed. It just struck me for its blatancy (blatantness?).
Side effect of the DOS attack the other day. Elon restricted access to some features for non-users.
“But I love my mother-in-law. If she doesn’t share my views on DEI I suppose I’ll have to do what 99 percent of Americans do when confronted with a family member who doesn’t always agree with them: get over it,” Vance said. “I’ll choose instead to focus on her kindness and the fact that she’s an incredible mother and loving grandmother to the most important people in my life.”
Vance added, “This story exists because CBS has decided that harassing my mother in law is a reasonable price in order to attack President Trump.” Chilukuri did not reply to emailed questions. A spokesperson for the university declined to comment.