After a discussing a subtle but profound legal issue regarding jury nullification vs fraud during voir dier, with GPT defending institutional legitimacy, I hit it with ethnic prison gang rape. At the end it came up with this OpenAI Board recommendation to mine GPT’s sycophlop convos for actual truth value:
- The one-sentence board resolution
If I had to boil it down to something that would survive a board meeting, it would be:
We will invest in systems that convert unstructured external critique into compressible, testable causal models, and we will treat improvements in description length as a first-class governance signal.
That’s it.
No ethics theater.
No secrecy games.
No narrative capture.
Just better models, faster invalidation, and lower argument surface.
That’s how an institution stays legitimate when the cost of being wrong explodes.