Possibly. Deliberately avoiding your points is a trollish behavior.
2 Likes
Musk loses motion to dismiss:
3 Likes
More suits:
Suit by petition signers:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69344880/mcaferty-v-musk/
Suit by ex Twitter Chief Marketing Officer:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69338589/berland-v-x-corp-successor-in-interest-to-twitter-inc/
2 Likes
4 Likes
That’s Our Democracy™ for ya: allow the delegates to defy the clearly-expressed will of the voters and “vote for someone other than” the choice of the people.
It turns out that Our Democracy™ is not a process; it is an outcome. If the electorate votes the right way, fine. If not, let’s find a way to undermine the electorate by making them vote again or by obstructing their will in other ways. Maybe the voters need to be defied to protect Our Democracy™.
7 Likes
Given the amount of lies and disinformation that was spread in an attempt to influence and undermine the ‘process’, I would have to agree with that.
I just call it what it is: supermarket-tabloid Democracy.
The country is getting stupider. The latest BlueAnon conspiracy theory dropped.
3 Likes
By the way, 4.4 million views on X.
3 Likes
3 Likes
BTW, much as I love Dana Carvey, his Musk impression did stink. As did the petty nature of that sketch.
And he should still be capable of doing good semi-political work on his own:
1 Like
Oh that the beautiful people @caddzooks speaks of did at least this amount of investigating of the WuFlu vax!
1 Like
Returning to the topic’s title, Mr. Musk, this is a tour of the Hawthorne plant he gave fourteen years ago while he was still the darling of the Left.
4 Likes
Labor law case in California:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69386283/perez-v-space-exploration-technologies-corporation/
4 Likes
DOGE suit (technically, Musk is not a party):
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69559444/public-citizen-inc-v-trump/
3 Likes
Named here:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69559476/lentini-v-department-of-government-efficiency/
2 Likes
Col. (Ret.) Kurt Schlichter recommending counterattack:
3 Likes
This reminds me of the honorific “esquire” back in the day when the only people who could practically avail themselves of dispute processing were knights wealthy enough to armor themselves.
This is one reason I keep going on about “10 inch blade, 50 ft of strong cordage and a wilderness area large enough to permit strategy” as the appeal of last resort in dispute processing for cultures of individual integrity.
If you don’t make dispute processing PRACTICAL for young men, you end up with a situation like the one we are in:
Only the wealthy and powerful can seek justice in matters that determine the fate of their bloodlines.
In that situation, so called “stake holders” in civilization are a tiny minority and civilization falls.
PS: I strongly suspect Trump’s use of gay icons like The Village People singing “Young Man” is a deliberate attempt to maintain a political economy in which young men are having their bloodlines terminated by the wealthy.
Sorry Trump. Bad plan. Check out Militia.Money
2 Likes
Much as I like Schlichter and enjoy his writing, I must disagree, not only because the suits would likely fail (his caveats notwithstanding) but also because the Afrikanische autismsturmführer meme is hilarious.
What a time to be alive!
5 Likes